Search Converts LLC BBB Business ReviewBBB Accredited Business · Eye To Ad Media, in Denver since 2012
Problem we fix ยท Google penalties

Manual action in Search Console? Fix the cause, then ask for review.

A manual action is the closest thing Google has to a formal penalty: a person on Google's team reviewed your site and found something that breaks its spam policies. It is serious, but it is also one of the few search problems with a clear process and a written answer at the end.

Updated October 10, 2026 · SEO Experts Denver

Quick answer: how do you remove a Google manual action?

Open the Manual Actions report in Google Search Console to see the type of action and which pages it affects. Fix every instance of the problem across the site, not just the examples Google lists, document what you did, then submit a reconsideration request from the same report. Google says most reviews take several days or weeks, and link-related requests can take longer. You receive an email when the review is complete.

First, make sure it is a manual action

Most sites that think they were penalized were not. A drop that coincides with a core update is algorithmic, and there is nothing to appeal. A real manual action leaves a record: it is listed in Search Console under Security & Manual Actions, and Google normally emails the verified owners. If the report says "No issues detected", a reconsideration request is not the tool you need; start with a traffic drop diagnosis instead.

Manual actions can apply to the whole site or only to specific pages or sections, and the report says which. Partial actions are common and sometimes explain why only one part of a site vanished.

The manual actions we see most on small business sites

Unnatural links to your site

Paid links, link networks, large-scale exchanges or old "SEO packages" that built links in bulk. Often bought years ago by a previous provider, which is why owners are surprised.

Thin content with little or no added value

Auto-generated or scraped pages, doorway pages for every suburb that say the same thing, or affiliate pages with nothing original.

Pure spam and scaled content

Large volumes of low-value pages published to capture search traffic. Increasingly associated with unreviewed mass AI publishing.

User-generated and hacked spam

Spam comments, forum profiles or injected pages you did not create. The fix starts with security, then cleanup.

Site reputation abuse

Third-party content hosted on your domain mainly to profit from your site's standing, such as coupon or casino sections rented to outsiders.

Structured data issues

Markup that misrepresents the page, such as review stars for reviews that are not shown, or event markup on pages that are not events.

The cleanup: fix every instance, not just the examples

The report usually gives a few sample URLs. Those are examples, not the full list. Requests fail most often because the owner fixed the samples and left the pattern in place elsewhere. Our cleanup works from the pattern outward.

  • For link actions: export links from Search Console and other sources, classify them, contact sites to remove links where possible, record every attempt, and use Google's disavow tool only for the links that cannot be removed.
  • For thin or scaled content: decide page by page whether to rewrite with genuine substance, consolidate into a stronger page, or remove and return a 404 or 410.
  • For hacked or user spam: close the hole first, remove the injected material, tighten comment and signup settings, and check that Google can see the clean pages.
  • For structured data: remove or correct markup so it describes only what visitors can see on the page.

Throughout, we keep a log: what was found, what was changed, when, and why. That log becomes the backbone of the request.

Writing a reconsideration request that holds up

Google's guidance for requests is short and specific: explain the exact quality issue on your site, describe the steps you have taken to fix it, and document the outcome of your efforts. In practice that means:

  1. Name the problem plainly. "Links were purchased through a previous SEO provider between 2019 and 2021" is better than "we may have had some bad links".
  2. Describe what was done, with numbers: how many links reviewed, how many removed, how many disavowed, how many pages rewritten or removed.
  3. Link to the evidence, such as a shared spreadsheet of outreach attempts or a list of removed URLs.
  4. Explain what changed so it will not happen again, such as a new content review step or who now approves outside work.

Google advises against resubmitting while a request is still under review. If a request is rejected, the response usually indicates what remains, and the next request should address it fully rather than repeat the first one.

Be wary of anyone who offers to "remove your penalty" quickly for a flat fee without first looking at the report. No one outside Google can lift a manual action. All a provider can do is fix the cause and present it well.

After the action is lifted

Revocation removes the manual demotion, but it does not restore whatever value the violating material appeared to provide. If rankings depended on purchased links, they will not all come back, because those links no longer count. That is why the recovery plan continues past the approval email: building the legitimate signals and content that should have been there in the first place.

Sources

  1. Search Console Help: Manual Actions report
  2. Search Console Help: Reconsideration requests
  3. Google Search Central: Spam policies for Google web search

Questions people ask

How long does a reconsideration request take?

Google's Manual Actions help page says most reviews take several days or weeks, and that some, such as link-related requests, can take longer. You get an email when Google receives the request and another when the review is complete.

Will my rankings come back once the manual action is removed?

The manual demotion ends, but rankings that depended on the violating material, such as purchased links, will not fully return because those signals no longer count. Recovery after revocation depends on the legitimate strength of the site.

Can I just disavow every link and submit a request?

That is risky and rarely works on its own. Google expects a genuine effort to remove bad links where possible, with the disavow file used for what cannot be removed. Disavowing good links indiscriminately can also hurt you.

My previous SEO company built the bad links. Does that matter?

It explains how it happened, and it is worth saying so in the request, but the site owner is still responsible for the cleanup. Show what you have changed so it cannot happen again.

Is a manual action the same as a Google update penalty?

No. Manual actions are applied by reviewers and appear in Search Console with a reconsideration process. Algorithmic changes from core updates have no notice and no appeal.

Talk to a person

Tell an expert what is going wrong

Send a few lines about the problem, or call. You get a straight read on what is likely happening and what it would take to fix, before anyone talks about money.

  • The free audit and first conversation carry no contract.
  • Project work gets a fixed written quote before anything starts.
  • Zach Wennstedt, founder of Eye To Ad Media, works directly on client accounts.
  • If SEO is the wrong tool for your problem, you will hear that too.

Prefer the phone?

1-800-481-8638

Ask an SEO expert

Describe the problem. A person reads every message.

No obligation. Sent to Eye To Ad Media in Denver. See the privacy policy.

Search Converts LLC BBB Business ReviewBBB Accredited Business. A real person reads every request.
Call nowFree diagnosis